Basic Common Sense!

Posted September 23, 2010 by despicable
Categories: "new world order", athiest, capitalism, communism, conservative, democracy, democrat, dialectics, economists, economy, futurist, globalist, Liberal, Libertarian, marxism, materialism, moderates, nationalism, politics, progressiive, Progressive, progressive, progressive, public, religion, republican, revolution, science, socialism, socialist, system, Uncategorized, Workers Revolution

I admit that I have much to learn about many things! I am a simple high school drop out. but there are some things that I am very sure of, because it occupies the realm of basic common sense.


You don’t have to be a college graduate to understand generally how life moves forward, backward and seemingly stands still.


It is apparent to me that on the road of life you can attempt to either stand still in the present, move backward into the past, or move forward into the future.


From the beginning of time this has been the alternatives that people faced and they aligned themselves with one of those alternatives.


You don’t have to be a college graduate to be able to predict that eventually the people who stand still and compromise with those that want to go back to the way it was in the past, and those that want to move to the opposite direction from the way it was in the past and move forward to a way it will become in the future.
You can predict with scientific certainty that the political center will always compromise so that they can keep everything the same as it presently is. 


The centrists know, that if they can’t keep those that represent the past and the future apart by compromise, that it would be certain that the opposites of the political spectrum, will clash and what will inevitably happen is a backward movement to the no longer relevant past, or a forward movement to the untested future. 


Because the past is no longer relevant to the new emerging circumstances, situations and conditions, that exist in our changing environment, and the centrists are out of step with what is happening everywhere in our common environment, it becomes apparent that the moderate political center is destined to be replaced by a new moderate political center, that is more relevant to the constantly changing conditions.


It becomes apparent that the future can only become the diametric opposite of that what existed in the past and in the present.

It becomes obvious that a new moderate relevant political center will come into being so as to take the place of the old no longer relevant political center.

The role of this new political center, will be to moderate under the new revolutionary conditions, the relationship between the revolutionary opposite forces of those that want to be more revolutionary, and those that want to become less revolutionary, because the conditions do or do not as yet warrant a drastic change. 


This is all predictable because it is a repeat of what happened everywhere in history for as long as their has been a recorded history.


For anyone to say that the future cannot be predicted, has to be either not informed or a obsecuritist.




The Reflection of MATTER in MOTION!

Posted September 22, 2010 by despicable
Categories: "new world order", Anarchist, athiest, capitalism, communism, dialectics, economists, economy, finance, futurist, globalist, Liberal, Libertarian, marxism, materialism, nationalism, politics, progressiive, Progressive, progressive, public, revolution, science, socialism, socialist, system, Uncategorized, Workers Revolution

A theory means that something has as yet, not been proven!


My understanding is that Science has proven that as far as Science knows that nothing has been proven to exist outside of “Matter in Motion.”and all that what reflects “Matter in Motion.”


It is my understanding that the meaning of the Scientific Method, is that Science either “KNOWS” or “DOES NOT KNOW!”

That science does not BELIEVE, there for does not need to rely on FAITH to eliminate “DOUBT!”

Science only relies on concrete indisputable evidence, to be able to say that this exists and is a scientific fact!


If science cannot prove that something out of the natural world exists, how can anyone possibly say, what many uninformed people have said about the composition of the world ” That it had not been proven that the world is not exclusively material.”

When I say that the world is exclusively material, my meaning is that what is composed of matter, and all that reflects matter in motion!


This reflection encompasses sound, art, language music, math etc. etc. This is the understanding of dialectical materialists from the get go, and it is not in conflict with my understanding of materialism.


My objections are with those that use the reflection of Matter as an argument that, “their exists non material substances that prove that the world is not entirely Matter.”


The reflection of material substances and the consequences that occur as a result of this connection is a part of my understanding of dialectical Materialism!

Interaction of Opposites!

Posted September 20, 2010 by despicable
Categories: capitalism, centrists, communism, community, conservative, democracy, democrat, dialectics, economists, economy, finance, futurist, globalist, Liberal, Libertarian, marxism, materialism, moderates, politics, Progressive, progressive, public, religion, republican, revolution, science, social, socialism, socialist, system, Uncategorized

Whenever you have social and political opposites interacting, you will have the emotion of hate, as a natural emotional consequence.

Competition breeds “hate.” of those, that they are competing with. Cooperation breeds “love!”

The intensity of your feelings will depend on how partisan your feelings are in the struggle between natural opposing forces.

The extremes at the opposite sides of a spectrum will act in extreme ways because of their extreme partisan feelings

Those at the center of the political spectrum will be moderate in their feelings and inclined to compromise between opposite forces.

The “Moderates eventually will be regarded as “SELL OUT” traitors, by the extreme elements, at the partisan extreme ends, of the political spectrum.

Conflict between opposite forces occurs when the moderate compromising center becomes no longer relevant to the conditions and surroundings that exist in the total environment.

Without a center to separate the extreme opposite ends of the political spectrum the consequence will naturally be a CLASH of opposites that will either take us to the no longer relevant past, or towards a new more relevant future.

That what is no longer relevant will always be overthrown, and a new more relevant modern moderate CENTER, that is in harmony with the modern circumstances, situations and conditions, will come into being, taking the place of the old no longer relevant political moderate CENTER.

The question of “LOVE and HATE is not determined by a lack of feeling or understanding.

It depends on how partisan you are in the normal struggle for and against that what is central to your life!

DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM!

Posted September 17, 2010 by despicable
Categories: athiest, capitalism, communism, conservative, dialectics, economists, economy, futurist, globalist, Liberal, Libertarian, marxism, materialism, politics, progressiive, Progressive, progressive, republican, revolution, science, socialism, socialist, system, Uncategorized

I have always maintained that Marxism is a way to understand the way society changes “SCIENTIFICALLY!”
My understanding of the “Scientific Method.” is that SCIENTISTS do not believe! They either “KNOW or they DO NOT KNOW!”
“Belief” is the absence of knowing, and that is why BELIEVERS must rely on FAITH to eliminate doubt from what they believe in.
Scientists do not have or need FAITH , because their understanding is determined by “EVIDENCE” and the more verifiable evidence that the scientists have, the more probability that the findings of those that use the scientific method is correct.
Philosophy cannot be an objective understanding of OBJECTIVE REALITY.
The product of a philosophers abstract thinking. It is primarily not based on the discovery of evidence, but is the inner workings of the philosophers brain. It is SUBJECTIVE NOT OBJECTIVE!
“DIALECTICS is based on the “PHILOSOPHY of Hegel! But what MARX did with the philosophy of Hegel, was to turn HEGEL’S philosophy on it’s head and turn it into it’s opposite of what it formerly was.
Marx turned Hegel’s “Dialectic,” from a subjective Metaphysical philosophy of “How many angels could dance on the head of a needle,” to a Objective Materialist Science. A science that became “DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM!”
Dialectical Materialism is the understanding that Matter is PRIMARY and nothing exists outside of MATTER IN MOTION!
It is impossible to destroy or create the matter that exists, so the only conclusion that can be scientifically arrived at is that MATTER ALWAYS EXISTED!
Matter is constantly changing and the way it changes from one form to another form that is incidentally a more evolved form, …is by moving in a DIALECTICAL way that is forced to do so by the irreconcilable contradictions that exist inside of all forms of matter and everything that reflects “MATTER IN MOTION!” 

When Hegel’s Dialectics was transformed by Karl Marx it was no longer a subjective philosophy. It became an objective SCIENCE!
Qualitatively different from what it formerly was.

All true scientists attempt to discover what is objectively true and they attempt to do so by approaching their subject matter with as much of an open mind as is humanly possible.
To do otherwise would prejuidice their scientific findings and would contaminate what they were scientifically attempting to do.

Because my understanding of Dialectical Materialism is objective and not subjective.
It would not be rational for me to BELIEVE in Dialectical Materialism, because It is not an “IDEOLOGY! It is a SCIENCE!
A Science of understanding of what occurred in the past and what is occurring in the present and consequently what will occur in the future.

Because it is a scientific understanding. and it is not an “IDEOLOGICAL BELIEF, I cannot believe in what events will happen in the future! … I can SCIENTIFICALLY know what events will happen in the future!
I know that ‘Socialism will follow Capitalism and that Communism will follow Socialism!
This is not what I believe, this is what I know!
SCIENCE is capable of predicting outcome. Science when it understands a particular cause can accurately predict the particular effect of that particular cause.
Science using the scientific method can accurately predict the future!
Those that enter the arena to argue that MARXISM is an IDEOLOGY or a PHILOSOPHY is dead wrong and does the science of Marxism a disservice!

WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?

Posted September 6, 2010 by despicable
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

There are groups and there are individuals that will engage in conspiracies because it serves a particular interest to do so. To turn a blind eye to that irrefutable fact , is just plain stupid!
!t should be and probably is recognized by all sensible people that individuals, groups and economic classes are pitted one against the other because of the nature of the particular relationship.
What serves the best interest of a BUYER does not serve the best interest of a SELLER, because their interests are diametrically opposed to each other. A Buyer’s best interest is to buy low, and a seller’s best interest is to sell high! This is what is known as a “IRRECONCILABLE CONTRADICTION” in the relationship between the buyer and the seller.
It is reasonable to assume that it would be natural for the buyer and the seller to engage in conspiracies one against the other because it would serve their best interest to do so.
That is why it became necessary to pass “ANTI TRUST” legislation so as to protect the consumer from a monopoly and a conspiracy by BIG BUSINESS to fix prices that would exploit the buyer by forcing him to buy at a controlled high price.
The Government conspired to protect, the consumer from big business that conspired against the consumer.
The interest of “LABOR and CAPITAL” are diametrically opposed one against the other!
Their relationship is antagonistic because the relationship is based on the worker creating value by his labor and receiving value in the form of a wage that is not equal to the value that the worker created with his labor. That value that he produced and did not receive as a wage was the capitalist’s profit that was stolen or exploited from the worker.
Because of this relationship their is a natural conflict of interests that is manifested in this relationship that will naturally put capital and labor at each other’s throat, and will encourage class struggle and conspiracies, one against the other.
Most change that occurs does so, not by conspiracies, but by the natural flow of events.
The concentration of capital in increasingly fewer hands, is the natural expectation, when smaller sharks in the sea of competition are being swallowed by the larger sharks.
“PROGRESS” is a road that moves forward into the future! the opposite of progress is taking the road that leads backward into the past. By standing still not moving forward or backward is being stuck in the present without a thought of the past or the future.
I guess it all boils down to ” WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?”

Science is the Future!

Posted August 29, 2010 by despicable
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

As a DIALECTICAL MATERIALIST I would like to argue against the notion that PHILOSOPHY is or can be scientific, and that the ideas of philosophers can be regarded as a scientific truth.

“Dialectical Materialists” do not BELIEVE! They either, “KNOW”, or They “DO NOT KNOW!”

BELIEF is the absence of knowledge! That is why believers must rely on Faith to erase doubt from the equation.

Scientists rely on only EVIDENCE to understand what is real and objectively true.

Scientists approach the unknown with a open mind, as much as humanly possible so as to be objective and not subjective, and thereby prejudice their quest to make what is unknown, KNOWN.

Philosophers can only be “SUBJECTIVE” in their philosophical ideas. If they were not subjective, but objective in their understanding, they would not be “PHILOSOPHERS,” they would be “SCIENTISTS!”

Marxism is not a philosophy! It is a “SCIENCE”! A science of what is known of the past, the present, and consequently what will be the shape of our future. It is not what we as Marxists believe in. It is what we as marxist, KNOW as a scientific fact.

“Philosophy,” like “Religion,” is destined to be trashed and placed into the trash can of our backward past. The future belongs to “SCIENCE!”

Intellect/Instinct/Conservative

Posted August 13, 2010 by despicable
Categories: capitalism, dialectics, marxism, materialism, politics, progressiive, progressive, socialism, Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , ,

Their are many “Conservatives” that are dirt poor! But seemingly what unites them is not INCOME but is a tendency to be very shallow in their thought process!

Conservatives cannot it seems, free themselves from the traditions that are no longer relevant to the constantly changing conditions, circumstances and situations that occur with the passage of time.

CONSERVATIVES, do not have the ability to soar above the forrest so as to get a bird’s eye view of what is happening inside the forest, and that is why they cannot see the forrest because of the trees.

Because of this surface understanding of what is happening all around them, Conservatives are inclined to not be aware of the true nature and character of a changing world that they fear is leaving them behind.

When you are able to see, understand and connect the past to the present and understand how the future will most likely unfold, then perhaps those that call themselves “Conservative,” will become smart enough to use their intellect, rather than their prejudices and primitive instincts, to survive and attempt to move forward in a changing world.

“Conservatives” have a dogmatic blind infatuation with the system of “CAPITALISM.”

The Conservatives appear blind to the fact that the system of capitalism has gone through many transformations, and is no longer a system of “FREE ENTERPRISE.” but has predictably changed from a system that was basically a competition inside a “FREE Market Economy of small business, to a Market Economy of basically a competition of LARGE CORPORATE Interests, with small business entities merging with the few corporate giants so as to survive in a fiercely competitive market place, …to a economic system, with a marketplace of cooperating global multi-nationals, that will increasingly control supply and demand inside a global marketplace, that will increasingly dominate and control and exploit economically all of the consumers and workers of the world.

Because every cause will create a predictable effect. The global market economy, that is planned and designed to profit the few by exploiting and dominating all those that are not a part of this world oligarchy will cause the effect of changing to the opposite of what exists.

That opposite is a Planned Economy that is designed to profit all of the people without discrimination on the planet earth.

It is my understanding, that to evolve, and to think on a level that is beyond instinct, and at the higher level that can be described as INTELLECT, is something that conservatives have not as yet been able to achieve.

Conservatives, it appears, had been born stupid, and most likely will die, stupid!