Archive for September 2010

Objective Science!

September 27, 2010

When I say that it is a scientific certainty that socialism will follow capitalism, and that communism will follow socialism, It is with the understanding of Marx’s Dialectic that shows that everything eventually changes to the diametrical opposite of what previously existed.

This qualitative change is accompanied with what Marx called the “Negation of the Negation!” This means that the anatomy of change does not repeat itself as it moves perhaps temporarily backward for a time and then ultimately forward to a new qualitatively opposite of what previously existed. This is understood by most Marxists as a DIALECTICAL LEAP!

Change can only be defined as moving forward or moving backward. Or it can seemingly stand still.

The consequences of matter slowing down and appearing to stand still is the falling apart, rather then the coming together of the combined elements that make up a particular whole.

The opposite that defines Capitalism, (a system that rests upon a foundation of a economy that is designed to enrich the capitalist few,) is the Communist model that rests on a economic foundation that is designed to enrich equally everyone that is a part of that communist economic foundation.
Capitalism is a CLASS society the diametrical opposite of a Communist classless society.

Socialism is a bridge to the classless system of Communism.

The POINT that I am attempting to make, is that for a change to take place, Quantitative or Qualitative, if it is premature because the conditions have not as yet matured, so as a result of this lack of having the necessary conditions, that what comes into being prematurely, will most likely be still born, because of a lack of life support.

Because the transition from capitalism is not predictably smooth, because of faulty judgements as to the readiness of a particular change to take place, does not mean that ultimately the opposite of what presently exists will not happen. It will happen when all of the right conditions are in place for it to happen.
It is scientifically predictable.

I still maintain that “Dialectical Materialism” is a PREDICTABLE SCIENCE! and is not a PHILOSOPHY or a IDEOLOGY!

Karl Marx transformed Hegel’s “Subjective Philosophy,” to the diametrical opposite, and in so doing he performed a “Dialectical Leap!” by changing Hegel’s Subjective Philosophy to a “Marxist Objective Science.

Advertisements

Basic Common Sense!

September 23, 2010

I admit that I have much to learn about many things! I am a simple high school drop out. but there are some things that I am very sure of, because it occupies the realm of basic common sense.


You don’t have to be a college graduate to understand generally how life moves forward, backward and seemingly stands still.


It is apparent to me that on the road of life you can attempt to either stand still in the present, move backward into the past, or move forward into the future.


From the beginning of time this has been the alternatives that people faced and they aligned themselves with one of those alternatives.


You don’t have to be a college graduate to be able to predict that eventually the people who stand still and compromise with those that want to go back to the way it was in the past, and those that want to move to the opposite direction from the way it was in the past and move forward to a way it will become in the future.
You can predict with scientific certainty that the political center will always compromise so that they can keep everything the same as it presently is. 


The centrists know, that if they can’t keep those that represent the past and the future apart by compromise, that it would be certain that the opposites of the political spectrum, will clash and what will inevitably happen is a backward movement to the no longer relevant past, or a forward movement to the untested future. 


Because the past is no longer relevant to the new emerging circumstances, situations and conditions, that exist in our changing environment, and the centrists are out of step with what is happening everywhere in our common environment, it becomes apparent that the moderate political center is destined to be replaced by a new moderate political center, that is more relevant to the constantly changing conditions.


It becomes apparent that the future can only become the diametric opposite of that what existed in the past and in the present.

It becomes obvious that a new moderate relevant political center will come into being so as to take the place of the old no longer relevant political center.

The role of this new political center, will be to moderate under the new revolutionary conditions, the relationship between the revolutionary opposite forces of those that want to be more revolutionary, and those that want to become less revolutionary, because the conditions do or do not as yet warrant a drastic change. 


This is all predictable because it is a repeat of what happened everywhere in history for as long as their has been a recorded history.


For anyone to say that the future cannot be predicted, has to be either not informed or a obsecuritist.




The Reflection of MATTER in MOTION!

September 22, 2010

A theory means that something has as yet, not been proven!


My understanding is that Science has proven that as far as Science knows that nothing has been proven to exist outside of “Matter in Motion.”and all that what reflects “Matter in Motion.”


It is my understanding that the meaning of the Scientific Method, is that Science either “KNOWS” or “DOES NOT KNOW!”

That science does not BELIEVE, there for does not need to rely on FAITH to eliminate “DOUBT!”

Science only relies on concrete indisputable evidence, to be able to say that this exists and is a scientific fact!


If science cannot prove that something out of the natural world exists, how can anyone possibly say, what many uninformed people have said about the composition of the world ” That it had not been proven that the world is not exclusively material.”

When I say that the world is exclusively material, my meaning is that what is composed of matter, and all that reflects matter in motion!


This reflection encompasses sound, art, language music, math etc. etc. This is the understanding of dialectical materialists from the get go, and it is not in conflict with my understanding of materialism.


My objections are with those that use the reflection of Matter as an argument that, “their exists non material substances that prove that the world is not entirely Matter.”


The reflection of material substances and the consequences that occur as a result of this connection is a part of my understanding of dialectical Materialism!

Interaction of Opposites!

September 20, 2010

Whenever you have social and political opposites interacting, you will have the emotion of hate, as a natural emotional consequence.

Competition breeds “hate.” of those, that they are competing with. Cooperation breeds “love!”

The intensity of your feelings will depend on how partisan your feelings are in the struggle between natural opposing forces.

The extremes at the opposite sides of a spectrum will act in extreme ways because of their extreme partisan feelings

Those at the center of the political spectrum will be moderate in their feelings and inclined to compromise between opposite forces.

The “Moderates eventually will be regarded as “SELL OUT” traitors, by the extreme elements, at the partisan extreme ends, of the political spectrum.

Conflict between opposite forces occurs when the moderate compromising center becomes no longer relevant to the conditions and surroundings that exist in the total environment.

Without a center to separate the extreme opposite ends of the political spectrum the consequence will naturally be a CLASH of opposites that will either take us to the no longer relevant past, or towards a new more relevant future.

That what is no longer relevant will always be overthrown, and a new more relevant modern moderate CENTER, that is in harmony with the modern circumstances, situations and conditions, will come into being, taking the place of the old no longer relevant political moderate CENTER.

The question of “LOVE and HATE is not determined by a lack of feeling or understanding.

It depends on how partisan you are in the normal struggle for and against that what is central to your life!

DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM!

September 17, 2010

I have always maintained that Marxism is a way to understand the way society changes “SCIENTIFICALLY!”
My understanding of the “Scientific Method.” is that SCIENTISTS do not believe! They either “KNOW or they DO NOT KNOW!”
“Belief” is the absence of knowing, and that is why BELIEVERS must rely on FAITH to eliminate doubt from what they believe in.
Scientists do not have or need FAITH , because their understanding is determined by “EVIDENCE” and the more verifiable evidence that the scientists have, the more probability that the findings of those that use the scientific method is correct.
Philosophy cannot be an objective understanding of OBJECTIVE REALITY.
The product of a philosophers abstract thinking. It is primarily not based on the discovery of evidence, but is the inner workings of the philosophers brain. It is SUBJECTIVE NOT OBJECTIVE!
“DIALECTICS is based on the “PHILOSOPHY of Hegel! But what MARX did with the philosophy of Hegel, was to turn HEGEL’S philosophy on it’s head and turn it into it’s opposite of what it formerly was.
Marx turned Hegel’s “Dialectic,” from a subjective Metaphysical philosophy of “How many angels could dance on the head of a needle,” to a Objective Materialist Science. A science that became “DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM!”
Dialectical Materialism is the understanding that Matter is PRIMARY and nothing exists outside of MATTER IN MOTION!
It is impossible to destroy or create the matter that exists, so the only conclusion that can be scientifically arrived at is that MATTER ALWAYS EXISTED!
Matter is constantly changing and the way it changes from one form to another form that is incidentally a more evolved form, …is by moving in a DIALECTICAL way that is forced to do so by the irreconcilable contradictions that exist inside of all forms of matter and everything that reflects “MATTER IN MOTION!” 

When Hegel’s Dialectics was transformed by Karl Marx it was no longer a subjective philosophy. It became an objective SCIENCE!
Qualitatively different from what it formerly was.

All true scientists attempt to discover what is objectively true and they attempt to do so by approaching their subject matter with as much of an open mind as is humanly possible.
To do otherwise would prejuidice their scientific findings and would contaminate what they were scientifically attempting to do.

Because my understanding of Dialectical Materialism is objective and not subjective.
It would not be rational for me to BELIEVE in Dialectical Materialism, because It is not an “IDEOLOGY! It is a SCIENCE!
A Science of understanding of what occurred in the past and what is occurring in the present and consequently what will occur in the future.

Because it is a scientific understanding. and it is not an “IDEOLOGICAL BELIEF, I cannot believe in what events will happen in the future! … I can SCIENTIFICALLY know what events will happen in the future!
I know that ‘Socialism will follow Capitalism and that Communism will follow Socialism!
This is not what I believe, this is what I know!
SCIENCE is capable of predicting outcome. Science when it understands a particular cause can accurately predict the particular effect of that particular cause.
Science using the scientific method can accurately predict the future!
Those that enter the arena to argue that MARXISM is an IDEOLOGY or a PHILOSOPHY is dead wrong and does the science of Marxism a disservice!

WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?

September 6, 2010

There are groups and there are individuals that will engage in conspiracies because it serves a particular interest to do so. To turn a blind eye to that irrefutable fact , is just plain stupid!
!t should be and probably is recognized by all sensible people that individuals, groups and economic classes are pitted one against the other because of the nature of the particular relationship.
What serves the best interest of a BUYER does not serve the best interest of a SELLER, because their interests are diametrically opposed to each other. A Buyer’s best interest is to buy low, and a seller’s best interest is to sell high! This is what is known as a “IRRECONCILABLE CONTRADICTION” in the relationship between the buyer and the seller.
It is reasonable to assume that it would be natural for the buyer and the seller to engage in conspiracies one against the other because it would serve their best interest to do so.
That is why it became necessary to pass “ANTI TRUST” legislation so as to protect the consumer from a monopoly and a conspiracy by BIG BUSINESS to fix prices that would exploit the buyer by forcing him to buy at a controlled high price.
The Government conspired to protect, the consumer from big business that conspired against the consumer.
The interest of “LABOR and CAPITAL” are diametrically opposed one against the other!
Their relationship is antagonistic because the relationship is based on the worker creating value by his labor and receiving value in the form of a wage that is not equal to the value that the worker created with his labor. That value that he produced and did not receive as a wage was the capitalist’s profit that was stolen or exploited from the worker.
Because of this relationship their is a natural conflict of interests that is manifested in this relationship that will naturally put capital and labor at each other’s throat, and will encourage class struggle and conspiracies, one against the other.
Most change that occurs does so, not by conspiracies, but by the natural flow of events.
The concentration of capital in increasingly fewer hands, is the natural expectation, when smaller sharks in the sea of competition are being swallowed by the larger sharks.
“PROGRESS” is a road that moves forward into the future! the opposite of progress is taking the road that leads backward into the past. By standing still not moving forward or backward is being stuck in the present without a thought of the past or the future.
I guess it all boils down to ” WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?”