Science Rules!

All philosophy is ideology that no longer has relevance in the modern world where SCIENCE RULES!
Philosophy is a outmoded subjective notion of a way to go to live a happy full life.
Science has made philosophy no longer viable in the 21st century!
The scientific method is an objective way of knowing!
Philosophy is a subjective way of believing, just like religion.
With science you can predict outcome by understanding the surrounding objective material conditions that exist in a surrounding environment! To be compatible with that environment can be objectively determined, therefor a subjective philosophy becomes no longer needed or necessary.

Knowledge is the understanding that is acquired by the scientific discovery of factual information. Philosophers may or may not use scientifically discovered factual information when putting together a philosophical concept.
Philosophy is is basically a concept that originates in a philosophers brain.
Scientific concepts originates from discovered provable facts.
Philosophy is subjective, if it was objective it would no longer be philosophy.
It would be science!

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: athiest, capitalism, communism, conservative, democracy, democrat, dialectics, diversity, economists, fascist, futurist, globalist, Liberal, Libertarian, marxism, materialism, nationalism, politics, progressiive, religion, republican, revolution, science, separatists, socialism, system, Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

10 Comments on “Science Rules!”

  1. John Says:

    Did you use science to come to this conclusion? No, in fact you are working in a branch of philosophy called epistemology which examines knowledge– what it is, how we can attain it, what are its limits. You prove that it isn’t obsolete.

  2. despicable Says:

    Knowledge is the understanding that is acquired by the scientific discovery of factual information. Philosophers may or may not use scientifically discovered factual information when putting together a philosophical concept.
    Philosophy is is basically a concept that originates in a philosophers brain.
    Scientific concepts originates from discovered provable facts.
    Philosophy is subjective, if it was objective it would no longer be philosophy.
    It would be science!

  3. Tom Usher Says:

    Hello despicable,

    There is no experiment that will show how things are absent the experiment. You think the only things that are known are shown via testing? You will never know what you’re missing. You will never know what is shown to those who know otherwise. God to you is as the color red to someone who has been and always will be totally colorblind to red. Why are you so sure of yourself?

    God bless,

    Tom Usher

  4. despicable Says:

    I either know or I don’t know! It is delusional to say that you know something exists because you believe and feel strongly that it does.
    Superstition is ignorance that belongs to our not enlightened past. The scientific method has made all theories that are based on subjective thinking and not proven by science as merely theories. They will rise to the level of being a fact only when enough indisputable evidence is scientifically discovered to transform a particular theory into a particular fact.
    Knowing is better than believing because when you know there is no possibility of doubt.
    That is why I am so sure of myself.

  5. Tom Usher Says:

    Hello again despicable,

    Things happen when there is no doubt that will not happen when tested (doubted). It’s just the way it is. You’re in a closed loop. Soften your heart.

    Still, God bless,

    Tom Usher


  6. Ignorance is not knowing! Believing is not knowing! That is why you need blind faith to support what you do not know to be true. All religions are subjective nonsense because all religions have a foundation that are built on the premise of belief! Not knowing! Ignorance!
    Because religion has a foundation of not knowing they place on a pedestal ignorance, and attempt to undermine the opposite of ignorance, and that is indisputable knowledge that is gathered by using the scientific method!
    Knowledge will always conquer ignorance and is the wave of the future! All belief will be buried in the trash can that holds our unenlightened past.
    You either KNOW or you DON’T KNOW! What you don’t know you attempt to make known by approaching what you don’t know with an open mind.
    And not a hard head, … and not a hard heart!

  7. Tom Usher Says:

    Hello Richard Walters,

    “Ignorance is not knowing!” So far, you’re right.

    “Believing is not knowing!” So, therefore, you don’t believe in what you think you know. That’s illogical.

    “That is why you need blind faith to support what you do not know to be true.” Who doesn’t know what to be true? I know God is true. I’m not ignorant about it. You don’t know; therefore, you are ignorant of God.

    “All religions are subjective nonsense because all religions have a foundation that are built on the premise of belief!” Well, I already dealt with that above. Check your logic.

    “Because religion has a foundation of not knowing they place on a pedestal ignorance, and attempt to undermine the opposite of ignorance, and that is indisputable knowledge that is gathered by using the scientific method!” I dealt with that already too. It’s redundant. However, I will add that the “indisputable knowledge” is forever limited. It can’t break out. It can’t see the door. It’s blind. It’s in the dark.

    “Knowledge will always conquer ignorance and is the wave of the future!” Well, you’re back to saying something that is correct again.

    “All belief will be buried in the trash can that holds our unenlightened past.” That must then necessarily include your belief in what you mean by the scientific method.

    “You either KNOW or you DON’T KNOW!” Do exclamation marks help prove anything? No, they don’t. Neither do all caps.

    “What you don’t know you attempt to make known by approaching what you don’t know with an open mind.
    And not a hard head, … and not a hard heart!” Right again.

    So, what have you said?

    You don’t know whether or not I know in no uncertain terms whether or not what you consider metaphysical or miraculous takes place. God won’t show to you. You can’t possibly know that God has not shown to me. Admit it. Be honest.

    What I told you is truth. Things happen that won’t happen where there is doubt. I’ve been there. I’ve experienced it firsthand. There is no amount of fuming about it that will alter that fact. I know what I’ve experience just as certainly as I know the Sun has been coming up everyday of my life here on Earth so far.

    You’re missing out. You’ve been misled.

    May God bless you with the whole truth.

    Tom Usher

  8. despicable Says:

    Believers in religion will tell you and they have told me that you have to have faith in your belief so as to erase doubt!
    It is acknowledged by most religions that their knowledge of their lord is based on faith, blind faith. Not evidence! It is subjective! Not objective!
    Without objective evidence, … faith, is the only thing that will support your belief system.
    The scientific method is not based on blind faith on a belief. …It is based on verifiable evidence! It is objective!
    Your “knowing” is really a… belief that you know. …A contradiction in terms!
    I do not believe. I Know what I know and I know what I don’t know! I rely on verifiable evidence to give me my understanding of my perception of reality.
    I approach all questions with an open mind! …All my answers are verified by tangible, verifiable and concrete evidence!
    Have the courage to be honest with yourself and do not fear what you do not know!

  9. Tom Usher Says:

    Hello Again,

    The “scientific method” is based on a belief in test results. It cannot know what refuses to be revealed via testing (in the spirit of doubt and ignorance). It assumes that if it can’t be tested, it can’t be known. It does not know that. It is a purely subjective viewpoint. It is unaware of the realm beyond testing and materialism.

    I have no blind faith in the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is evident. It has been revealed to me. What Christian, if any, ever told you that his or her faith is blind? Any such person does not speak for me. Jesus is the light. I was blind, but now I see. Have you not heard that before?

    Have you not studied the philosophy of what you term science? Why do you call yourself “despicable”? Why do you hate God?

    God is righteousness who lives regardless of whether or not humanity exists. Don’t you love righteousness?

    God bless everyone.

    Tom Usher

  10. despicable Says:

    You say “Why do you hate God? …It is impossible to hate or love something that to my way of thinking, does not exist! Science is not a “philosophy!” …It is a method that is used based on evidence to determine objective reality! Righteousness is to my way of thinking, that what is right and not wrong and what is right is that what can be proven to be right by using the scientific method of gathering indisputable evidence.
    I am only despicable to those that have the audacity to disagree with me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s