Blog Maniac

The End Of The NATION STATE!

despicable — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:09:11 +0000

The only people that you can trust in America are the Fascists and the Socialists! 

They are the only people that the American people can be sure of where they stand on the important issues of the day! 

Everyone in the middle of the political spectrum, are “compromising sell out artists” that cannot make up their minds as to the direction that America and the world should move toward.

They talk on both sides of their mouth and stand still when it becomes necessary to take a position and move in the direction of our no longer relevant past, and our not yet tested future. 

The world is now a “Global Enterprise” and those that believe that Nationalism and the American Nation is destined for greatness are living in the past and are out of touch with our modern reality.  

World Capitalism has outgrown the “Nation State” and cannot care less about what is the best policy for the American people. for the Middle Class or the “American Workers”

The policy of “Open Borders” is a policy that is in effect in all nations, so that Global Capitalism can take advantage and have the border-less workers of the world compete with each other in a race to the bottom of the barrel for wages.  

The Global Oligarchy of the largest capitalists on the planet have a world view of how to exploit the people and the resources of the planet in the quickest and most efficient way.

The age of competition is over, except for workers wages.  

“The Consumers” of the world are rapidly becoming impotent and powerless as they must bow down to the price dictates of a cooperating capitalist oligarchy that is no longer interested in a mere profit, but only interested in the highest and quickest rate of profit that is possible under prevailing economic conditions. 

This economic fascism can only be successful by controlling the world’s population with a world wide fascist police apparatus, that is as ruthless as was the regime of the Nazis under Hitler! 

The only resistance to these global Fascists will not come from the gutless Center of the political spectrum, but it will come from the Left Wing of the political spectrum, as was the case for progress, from the beginning of time to the present day.  

A planned world wide fascist market economy that will naturally be designed to profit the few controlling fascist capitalists can only be replaced by a world wide global planned economy that is designed to profit all of the people in the world without discrimination.  

The coming to an end of the “NATION STATE” is apparent to all of the people that have eyes to read what is written on the “Wall, of the things that are destined to become!”  

The only decision that you must make is……..
….WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?

SCIENCE and PHILOSOPHY!

despicable — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:13:24 +0000

It is my understanding that a time will come within the realm of science that what at one time was regarded as a “theory” will with the amount of concrete evidence be regarded by science as no longer theory but a probable fact. The degree of probability can be scientifically measured by the amount of concrete objective evidence that scientists have in their possession.
If philosophers had the discipline and understanding that scientists have in determining what is objectively real and true, they would no longer be philosophers, they would be scientists.

When Karl Marx considered Hegel’s “dialectic” he according to Marxist classics, turned the dialectic that was Hegel’s, on to it’s head, and transformed what was philosophical “metaphysical” and “idealism” to that what became scientific dialectical materialism. This transformation was not a quantitative but a qualitative leap change, it differentiated socialism that was “utopian” and based on metaphysical and philosophical ideas, to a socialism that was based on “science” and “materialism.” The description by Marx of his socialism was of it being “Scientific Socialism!”

Why is it important not to equate “Philosophy with Science? It is important because those that regard philosophy and science as co-equals will and do argue that the struggle for socialism and communism should be within the confines of arguing and debating with philosophers and ideologues the objective conditions that will inevitably bring about a particular social change.

It is my understanding that the science of “Dialectical Materialism” has made the need to debate with philosophers and Ideologues obsolete and a waste of time.
The modern and relevant need is to enter the realm of Science so as to discover and convince those that rely on scientific knowledge the accuracy of the predictability that the effect of capitalism will predictably transform the system of capitalism to the system of socialism, and that it is within the degree of probable scientific certainty that the effect of socialism will cause the transformation of socialism into the system of communism.

Those that cling to the no longer relevant concept that “truth and objective reality” can be arrived at by “Philosophers” and that philosophy serves a positive purpose in our modern world are mistaken.

It is this Marxist REVISIONIST thinking that has caused confusion and subjective notions of what is the meaning of Scientific Dialectical Materialism.

The SCIENTIFIC LAW OF PROBABILITY!

despicable — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:48:51 +0000

Science either KNOWS, or it does NOT KNOW! It does not BELIEVE!
What it knows it knows relative to the amount of physical evidence that exists relative to the hypothesis.

The degree of scientific certainty of what is transformed from a theory to a scientific fact is determined by the amount of hard indisputable evidence that exists relative to the hypothesis that is examined.

It is my understanding that science operates with the understanding that what is scientifically known is relatively known using the scientific law of “PROBABILITY.”

The more concrete evidence that scientists have, the more the degree of probability that what the scientists say is a probable fact.

It is very much probable that under the conditions of temperature change that water will dramatically change from a liquid form to a vapor form. It will do so under relatively the same temperature change and same surrounding conditions, over and over again.

It could be scientifically said that the probability of this occurring under similar conditions in the near and distant future is so much probable that it can be safely PREDICTED that it is very probable that what happened in the past, about water turning into steam will under similar conditions, will be repeated in the present and into the future.

The same could be said about “Capitalism” being the cause that creates the effect of “Socialism,” and that Socialism being the cause that creates the effect of Communism.

It is a scientific certainty, because of what we know of the past and the present, that the probability of this social change taking place, falls into the scientific realm of scientific certainty, and can be PREDICTED, scientifically that it will happen in the future.

It is the only possibility that exists for our future, using the scientific method!

Objective Science!

despicable — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:10:45 +0000

When I say that it is a scientific certainty that socialism will follow capitalism, and that communism will follow socialism, It is with the understanding of Marx’s Dialectic that shows that everything eventually changes to the diametrical opposite of what previously existed.

This qualitative change is accompanied with what Marx called the “Negation of the Negation!” This means that the anatomy of change does not repeat itself as it moves perhaps temporarily backward for a time and then ultimately forward to a new qualitatively opposite of what previously existed. This is understood by most Marxists as a DIALECTICAL LEAP!

Change can only be defined as moving forward or moving backward. Or it can seemingly stand still.

The consequences of matter slowing down and appearing to stand still is the falling apart, rather then the coming together of the combined elements that make up a particular whole.

The opposite that defines Capitalism, (a system that rests upon a foundation of a economy that is designed to enrich the capitalist few,) is the Communist model that rests on a economic foundation that is designed to enrich equally everyone that is a part of that communist economic foundation.
Capitalism is a CLASS society the diametrical opposite of a Communist classless society.

Socialism is a bridge to the classless system of Communism.

The POINT that I am attempting to make, is that for a change to take place, Quantitative or Qualitative, if it is premature because the conditions have not as yet matured, so as a result of this lack of having the necessary conditions, that what comes into being prematurely, will most likely be still born, because of a lack of life support.

Because the transition from capitalism is not predictably smooth, because of faulty judgements as to the readiness of a particular change to take place, does not mean that ultimately the opposite of what presently exists will not happen. It will happen when all of the right conditions are in place for it to happen.
It is scientifically predictable.

I still maintain that “Dialectical Materialism” is a PREDICTABLE SCIENCE! and is not a PHILOSOPHY or a IDEOLOGY!

Karl Marx transformed Hegel’s “Subjective Philosophy,” to the diametrical opposite, and in so doing he performed a “Dialectical Leap!” by changing Hegel’s Subjective Philosophy to a “Marxist Objective Science.

Basic Common Sense!

despicable — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:53:53 +0000

I admit that I have much to learn about many things! I am a simple high school drop out. but there are some things that I am very sure of, because it occupies the realm of basic common sense. 

You don’t have to be a college graduate to understand generally how life moves forward, backward and seemingly stands still. 

It is apparent to me that on the road of life you can attempt to either stand still in the present, move backward into the past, or move forward into the future. 

From the beginning of time this has been the alternatives that people faced and they aligned themselves with one of those alternatives. 

You don’t have to be a college graduate to be able to predict that eventually the people who stand still and compromise with those that want to go back to the way it was in the past, and those that want to move to the opposite direction from the way it was in the past and move forward to a way it will become in the future. You can predict with scientific certainty that the political center will always compromise so that they can keep everything the same as it presently is.  

The centrists know, that if they can’t keep those that represent the past and the future apart by compromise, that it would be certain that the opposites of the political spectrum, will clash and what will inevitably happen is a backward movement to the no longer relevant past, or a forward movement to the untested future.  

Because the past is no longer relevant to the new emerging circumstances, situations and conditions, that exist in our changing environment, and the centrists are out of step with what is happening everywhere in our common environment, it becomes apparent that the moderate political center is destined to be replaced by a new moderate political center, that is more relevant to the constantly changing conditions. 

It becomes apparent that the future can only become the diametric opposite of that what existed in the past and in the present.

It becomes obvious that a new moderate relevant political center will come into being so as to take the place of the old no longer relevant political center.

The role of this new political center, will be to moderate under the new revolutionary conditions, the relationship between the revolutionary opposite forces of those that want to be more revolutionary, and those that want to become less revolutionary, because the conditions do or do not as yet warrant a drastic change.  

This is all predictable because it is a repeat of what happened everywhere in history for as long as their has been a recorded history.

 For anyone to say that the future cannot be predicted, has to be either not informed or a obsecuritist.   

The Reflection of MATTER in MOTION!

despicable — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:28:43 +0000

A theory means that something has as yet, not been proven!

 My understanding is that Science has proven that as far as Science knows that nothing has been proven to exist outside of “Matter in Motion.”and all that what reflects “Matter in Motion.” 

It is my understanding that the meaning of the Scientific Method, is that Science either “KNOWS” or “DOES NOT KNOW!”

That science does not BELIEVE, there for does not need to rely on FAITH to eliminate “DOUBT!”

Science only relies on concrete indisputable evidence, to be able to say that this exists and is a scientific fact! 

If science cannot prove that something out of the natural world exists, how can anyone possibly say, what many uninformed people have said about the composition of the world ” That it had not been proven that the world is not exclusively material.”

When I say that the world is exclusively material, my meaning is that what is composed of matter, and all that reflects matter in motion! 

This reflection encompasses sound, art, language music, math etc. etc. This is the understanding of dialectical materialists from the get go, and it is not in conflict with my understanding of materialism. 

My objections are with those that use the reflection of Matter as an argument that, “their exists non material substances that prove that the world is not entirely Matter.” 

The reflection of material substances and the consequences that occur as a result of this connection is a part of my understanding of dialectical Materialism!

Interaction of Opposites!

despicable — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:28:50 +0000

Whenever you have social and political opposites interacting, you will have the emotion of hate, as a natural emotional consequence.

Competition breeds “hate.” of those, that they are competing with. Cooperation breeds “love!”

The intensity of your feelings will depend on how partisan your feelings are in the struggle between natural opposing forces.

The extremes at the opposite sides of a spectrum will act in extreme ways because of their extreme partisan feelings

Those at the center of the political spectrum will be moderate in their feelings and inclined to compromise between opposite forces.

The “Moderates eventually will be regarded as “SELL OUT” traitors, by the extreme elements, at the partisan extreme ends, of the political spectrum.

Conflict between opposite forces occurs when the moderate compromising center becomes no longer relevant to the conditions and surroundings that exist in the total environment.

Without a center to separate the extreme opposite ends of the political spectrum the consequence will naturally be a CLASH of opposites that will either take us to the no longer relevant past, or towards a new more relevant future.

That what is no longer relevant will always be overthrown, and a new more relevant modern moderate CENTER, that is in harmony with the modern circumstances, situations and conditions, will come into being, taking the place of the old no longer relevant political moderate CENTER.

The question of “LOVE and HATE is not determined by a lack of feeling or understanding.

It depends on how partisan you are in the normal struggle for and against that what is central to your life!

DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM!

despicable — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:48:46 +0000

I have always maintained that Marxism is a way to understand the way society changes “SCIENTIFICALLY!”
My understanding of the “Scientific Method.” is that SCIENTISTS do not believe! They either “KNOW or they DO NOT KNOW!”
“Belief” is the absence of knowing, and that is why BELIEVERS must rely on FAITH to eliminate doubt from what they believe in.
Scientists do not have or need FAITH , because their understanding is determined by “EVIDENCE” and the more verifiable evidence that the scientists have, the more probability that the findings of those that use the scientific method is correct.
Philosophy cannot be an objective understanding of OBJECTIVE REALITY.
The product of a philosophers abstract thinking. It is primarily not based on the discovery of evidence, but is the inner workings of the philosophers brain. It is SUBJECTIVE NOT OBJECTIVE!
“DIALECTICS is based on the “PHILOSOPHY of Hegel! But what MARX did with the philosophy of Hegel, was to turn HEGEL’S philosophy on it’s head and turn it into it’s opposite of what it formerly was.
Marx turned Hegel’s “Dialectic,” from a subjective Metaphysical philosophy of “How many angels could dance on the head of a needle,” to a Objective Materialist Science. A science that became “DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM!”
Dialectical Materialism is the understanding that Matter is PRIMARY and nothing exists outside of MATTER IN MOTION!
It is impossible to destroy or create the matter that exists, so the only conclusion that can be scientifically arrived at is that MATTER ALWAYS EXISTED!
Matter is constantly changing and the way it changes from one form to another form that is incidentally a more evolved form, …is by moving in a DIALECTICAL way that is forced to do so by the irreconcilable contradictions that exist inside of all forms of matter and everything that reflects “MATTER IN MOTION!”  
When Hegel’s Dialectics was transformed by Karl Marx it was no longer a subjective philosophy. It became an objective SCIENCE!
Qualitatively different from what it formerly was. 
All true scientists attempt to discover what is objectively true and they attempt to do so by approaching their subject matter with as much of an open mind as is humanly possible.
To do otherwise would prejuidice their scientific findings and would contaminate what they were scientifically attempting to do. 
Because my understanding of Dialectical Materialism is objective and not subjective.
It would not be rational for me to BELIEVE in Dialectical Materialism, because It is not an “IDEOLOGY! It is a SCIENCE!
A Science of understanding of what occurred in the past and what is occurring in the present and consequently what will occur in the future. 
Because it is a scientific understanding. and it is not an “IDEOLOGICAL BELIEF, I cannot believe in what events will happen in the future! … I can SCIENTIFICALLY know what events will happen in the future!
I know that ‘Socialism will follow Capitalism and that Communism will follow Socialism!
This is not what I believe, this is what I know!
SCIENCE is capable of predicting outcome. Science when it understands a particular cause can accurately predict the particular effect of that particular cause.
Science using the scientific method can accurately predict the future!
Those that enter the arena to argue that MARXISM is an IDEOLOGY or a PHILOSOPHY is dead wrong and does the science of Marxism a disservice!

WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?

despicable — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 05:43:43 +0000

There are groups and there are individuals that will engage in conspiracies because it serves a particular interest to do so. To turn a blind eye to that irrefutable fact , is just plain stupid!
!t should be and probably is recognized by all sensible people that individuals, groups and economic classes are pitted one against the other because of the nature of the particular relationship.
What serves the best interest of a BUYER does not serve the best interest of a SELLER, because their interests are diametrically opposed to each other. A Buyer’s best interest is to buy low, and a seller’s best interest is to sell high! This is what is known as a “IRRECONCILABLE CONTRADICTION” in the relationship between the buyer and the seller.
It is reasonable to assume that it would be natural for the buyer and the seller to engage in conspiracies one against the other because it would serve their best interest to do so.
That is why it became necessary to pass “ANTI TRUST” legislation so as to protect the consumer from a monopoly and a conspiracy by BIG BUSINESS to fix prices that would exploit the buyer by forcing him to buy at a controlled high price.
The Government conspired to protect, the consumer from big business that conspired against the consumer.
The interest of “LABOR and CAPITAL” are diametrically opposed one against the other!
Their relationship is antagonistic because the relationship is based on the worker creating value by his labor and receiving value in the form of a wage that is not equal to the value that the worker created with his labor. That value that he produced and did not receive as a wage was the capitalist’s profit that was stolen or exploited from the worker.
Because of this relationship their is a natural conflict of interests that is manifested in this relationship that will naturally put capital and labor at each other’s throat, and will encourage class struggle and conspiracies, one against the other.
Most change that occurs does so, not by conspiracies, but by the natural flow of events.
The concentration of capital in increasingly fewer hands, is the natural expectation, when smaller sharks in the sea of competition are being swallowed by the larger sharks.
“PROGRESS” is a road that moves forward into the future! the opposite of progress is taking the road that leads backward into the past. By standing still not moving forward or backward is being stuck in the present without a thought of the past or the future.
I guess it all boils down to ” WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?”

Science is the Future!

despicable — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:54:32 +0000

As a DIALECTICAL MATERIALIST I would like to argue against the notion that PHILOSOPHY is or can be scientific, and that the ideas of philosophers can be regarded as a scientific truth.

“Dialectical Materialists” do not BELIEVE! They either, “KNOW”, or They “DO NOT KNOW!”

BELIEF is the absence of knowledge! That is why believers must rely on Faith to erase doubt from the equation.

Scientists rely on only EVIDENCE to understand what is real and objectively true.

Scientists approach the unknown with a open mind, as much as humanly possible so as to be objective and not subjective, and thereby prejudice their quest to make what is unknown, KNOWN.

Philosophers can only be “SUBJECTIVE” in their philosophical ideas. If they were not subjective, but objective in their understanding, they would not be “PHILOSOPHERS,” they would be “SCIENTISTS!”

Marxism is not a philosophy! It is a “SCIENCE”! A science of what is known of the past, the present, and consequently what will be the shape of our future. It is not what we as Marxists believe in. It is what we as marxist, KNOW as a scientific fact.

“Philosophy,” like “Religion,” is destined to be trashed and placed into the trash can of our backward past. The future belongs to “SCIENCE!”